Professional Grading System
VECTOR IQ+ Bot uses a sophisticated, multi grading system similar to credit ratings, providing clear A+ to F grades across all analysis categories.
Grade Scale
🟢 A+ / A Grades (85-100 points)
Excellent Risk Profile: Minimal identified risks
Strong Fundamentals: Solid security, liquidity, and distribution
Recommended: Generally safe for investment consideration
Color Coding: Green indicators for immediate recognition
🟡 B Grades (70-84 points)
Good Risk Profile: Manageable risk factors identified
Solid Fundamentals: Good security with minor concerns
Acceptable: Reasonable investment consideration with due diligence
Color Coding: Yellow/Orange indicators
🟠C Grades (55-69 points)
Moderate Risk Profile: Several risk factors present
Mixed Fundamentals: Some concerns across multiple categories
Use Caution: Requires careful analysis and risk tolerance
Color Coding: Orange indicators for caution
🔴 D Grades (30-54 points)
Poor Risk Profile: Significant risks identified
Weak Fundamentals: Major concerns in key areas
High Risk: Not recommended for most users
Color Coding: Red indicators for warning
🔴 F Grades (0-29 points)
Critical Risk Profile: Severe risks or red flags
Failed Analysis: Major security or manipulation concerns
Avoid: Strong recommendation to avoid
Color Coding: Red indicators with critical warnings
Weighted Scoring System
Each analysis feature contributes to the overall grade based on its importance for token safety and legitimacy:
Primary Risk Factors (Highest Weight)
Security Analysis: 2.0x weight - Most critical for user safety
Holder Analysis: 1.5x weight - Whale concentration affects price stability
Wash Trading Analysis: 1.3x weight - Market manipulation detection
Secondary Risk Factors (Standard Weight)
Market Analysis: 1.0x weight - Liquidity and trading health
Sniper Analysis: 1.0x weight - Launch pattern analysis
Link Analysis: 0.5x weight - Informational transparency indicator
Grade Calculation Process
1. Individual Feature Scoring
Each feature starts with a base score (typically 50) and is adjusted based on:
Positive Factors: Add points for good indicators
Risk Factors: Subtract points for concerning patterns
Data Quality: Adjust for data availability and confidence
2. Weighted Combination
Individual scores are combined using the weight system:
Overall Score = (Security×2.0 + Holder×1.5 + WashTrading×1.3 + Market×1.0 + Sniper×1.0) / Total Weights3. Grade Assignment
The numerical score is converted to letter grades:
90-100: A+ (Exceptional)
85-89: A (Excellent)
80-84: A- (Very Good)
75-79: B+ (Good)
70-74: B (Above Average)
65-69: B- (Acceptable)
60-64: C+ (Below Average)
55-59: C (Poor)
50-54: C- (Very Poor)
40-49: D (High Risk)
30-39: D- (Very High Risk)
0-29: F (Critical Risk)
Risk Factor Analysis
Security Risk Factors
Unverified contracts
Active ownership with concerning permissions
High taxes or honeypot indicators
Known malicious patterns
Market Risk Factors
Very low liquidity (< $2,000)
Extreme market cap to liquidity ratios (> 100x)
Minimal trading volume
Price impact concerns
Holder Risk Factors
Extreme whale concentration (> 50% by few holders)
Very few real holders
Suspicious distribution patterns
Contract-heavy holder base
Trading Risk Factors
Rapid consecutive trades between same wallets
Circular trading patterns
Volume concentration in few wallets
Identical transaction amounts
Positive Indicators
Security Strengths
Verified contract source code
Renounced ownership
No taxes or reasonable taxes
Clean security audit results
Market Strengths
Sufficient liquidity (> $30,000)
Healthy MC/LP ratios (< 15x)
Consistent trading volume
Multiple trading pairs
Holder Strengths
Distributed ownership
Growing holder base
Mix of small and medium holders
Low whale concentration
Trading Strengths
Organic trading patterns
Diverse wallet participation
Reasonable trade timing
Volume spread across many wallets
The grading system is designed to be conservative, prioritizing user safety over potential upside.
Last updated